Cryptopolitan
2025-09-05 10:30:07

Adam Back calls for new Bitcoin rules to curb spam and inscriptions

Bitcoin’s network carries unnecessary spam that shifts economic incentives, commented Blockstream’s founder Adam Back on X. He called for new protocol rules to control the inscription industry, moving Bitcoin to its central purpose. Adam Back, the founder of Blockstream, spoke out against using the Bitcoin network to carry content. He called out against the “JPEG industry”, which produces fees for miners, but causes higher fee periods. Back spoke out after another social media war on the correct use of BTC. He also mentioned previous community wars on BTC block size, which led to multiple hard forks. This time, Back took the side that spam has no place on the chain. Bitcoin is owned by humanity, the protocol developers are stewards, and need consensus from users to change it materially. bitcoin is about money, spam has no place in the timechain. what defaults the bitcoin core project puts in the reference client matter in this. — Adam Back (@adam3us) September 5, 2025 Previously, the creation of NFTs and other inscriptions was seen as a solution to miner incentives, as network fees and block rewards fell. Currently, not all blocks see problems with JPEG spam, but Back pointed out the creation of images could weigh on the network during busy days, depriving regular senders from their transaction access. Adam Back noted Ordinals kept expanding in the past months Back pointed out the BTC network carried over 88M image inscriptions in May, rising to over 100M in August, with up to 7,000 BTC in monthly fees or roughly $250M per year. The inflows are a small part of miner revenues, but the days of peak traffic push miners to invest even more in equipment, raising the costs for all participants. Usually, BTC blocks are around 85% full and offer reasonable pricing, but the presence of Ordinals also means unexpected congestion and higher fees. | Source: Mempool . Bitcoin mining is already highly competitive, with the added effect of JPEG projects. While the NFT market is down from its peak, Bitcoin inscriptions seem to be thriving, having an expansion wave. For Back, this is an emergency, which may call for a change of rules, creating decentralized tools to filter out spam content. Currently, miners still have an incentive to mine the most profitable blocks. Most of the JPEG spam is in the form of Ordinals, which started to take off in 2023. Currently, Bitcoin developers are researching ways to keep block propagation efficient, while some miners are exploring ways to offer specialized block building for propagating JPEG and other content on-chain. There is still no consensus on the ideal usage of BTC, but BitMex research pointed at potential problems with block propagation when discouraging additional content. Who controls Bitcoin: users or core developers? The issue of so-called spam has been raised multiple times in the past. One of the issues is whether core developers can be held responsible for the end user and JPEG projects, including the economic incentives of VC-backed projects. If developers and node operators are involved, then there are concerns law enforcement may hold them accountable for the contents of the network. According to core developer Luke Dashjr, users still determine what the network will carry. Bitcoin doesn’t have some centralised entity protecting it. It relies on users. If users let themselves be coopted into a botnet attacking it, of course it will die. — Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) September 5, 2025 To date, the network has accrued over 97M inscriptions of various types, requiring a total of over $795M in fees over the years. Following a slow period during the 2023-2024 bull market, Ordinals have returned and even accelerated new inscriptions in the past months, as shown by Dune data . In the past, Dasjr has spoken for the removal of ordinals. Paradoxically, the recent discussion is only raising the mindshare of ordinals, making them more appealing for projects that go against the convictions of BTC maximalists. Ordinals were seen as a fad, coinciding with the NFTs boom, but their presence has shown to be a lasting issue for BTC network security, block propagation, and concerns about content. Sign up to Bybit and start trading with $30,050 in welcome gifts

Crypto 뉴스 레터 받기
면책 조항 읽기 : 본 웹 사이트, 하이퍼 링크 사이트, 관련 응용 프로그램, 포럼, 블로그, 소셜 미디어 계정 및 기타 플랫폼 (이하 "사이트")에 제공된 모든 콘텐츠는 제 3 자 출처에서 구입 한 일반적인 정보 용입니다. 우리는 정확성과 업데이트 성을 포함하여 우리의 콘텐츠와 관련하여 어떠한 종류의 보증도하지 않습니다. 우리가 제공하는 컨텐츠의 어떤 부분도 금융 조언, 법률 자문 또는 기타 용도에 대한 귀하의 특정 신뢰를위한 다른 형태의 조언을 구성하지 않습니다. 당사 콘텐츠의 사용 또는 의존은 전적으로 귀하의 책임과 재량에 달려 있습니다. 당신은 그들에게 의존하기 전에 우리 자신의 연구를 수행하고, 검토하고, 분석하고, 검증해야합니다. 거래는 큰 손실로 이어질 수있는 매우 위험한 활동이므로 결정을 내리기 전에 재무 고문에게 문의하십시오. 본 사이트의 어떠한 콘텐츠도 모집 또는 제공을 목적으로하지 않습니다.