cryptonews
2026-01-20 07:27:21

Hong Kong Securities Body Pushes Back On Tighter Crypto Licensing Rules

The Hong Kong securities industry is pushing back against a plan that would tighten the net around crypto exposure inside traditional portfolios, arguing the city risks scaring off mainstream asset managers just as it tries to build a deeper digital-asset market. In a submission dated Tuesday, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Professionals Association urged regulators to keep a long-standing “de minimis” carve-out for Type 9 licensed asset managers, warning that scrapping it would turn even tiny allocations into a full licensing trigger. Type 9 is Hong Kong’s standard licence for discretionary portfolio managers, the permission most traditional fund managers hold to run client money under the SFC’s rules. Proposed Rule Would Scrap 10% Crypto Threshold Under today’s uplifted regime, Type 9 managers can invest less than 10% of a fund’s gross asset value in virtual assets without seeking a separate virtual asset management licence, as long as they notify the Securities and Futures Commission. The proposal under consultation would remove that threshold. The industry group said the change effectively forces an “all-or-nothing” decision for firms that want to test crypto as a diversifier. “This ‘all-or-nothing’ approach is disproportionate,” it wrote, adding that it would impose major compliance costs even when risk exposure stays limited. It also urged regulators to bring the carve-out back in a clear, risk-based form. “We strongly propose reinstating a de minimis exemption,” the association said, arguing that managers below a set threshold should face a notification requirement rather than the full virtual asset management regime. The submission lands amid Hong Kong’s broader effort to widen its digital-asset rulebook. The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau and the SFC published consultation conclusions in December on licensing for virtual asset dealing services, and they opened a further public consultation on proposed licensing regimes for virtual asset advisory and management service providers. Hong Kong moves forward with crypto licensing for dealers, custodians, and advisory firms, strengthening oversight and investor protections. #CryptoRegulation #HongKong https://t.co/1ENWDTDJfg — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) December 24, 2025 Licensing Expansion Aims To Match Institutional Growth Custody rules have become another pressure point. The association criticized proposals that would require virtual asset managers to use only SFC-licensed custodians, saying the mandate could prove unworkable for private equity and venture funds that buy early-stage tokens that local custodians do not yet support. Hong Kong’s regulators have pitched the new licensing architecture as part of a push to bring more activity onshore, while tightening standards as institutional participation grows. Officials have also signalled they want a framework that can plug into existing regulated activity, rather than leaving crypto exposure to ad hoc interpretations. The debate matters because it goes to how quickly traditional finance joins the trade. Keeping a 10% carve-out makes it easier for stock and bond managers to add a small sleeve of Bitcoin or other tokens, while removal raises the bar to a full licence even for experimentation, creating a higher fixed cost before firms see meaningful demand. Hong Kong has tried to balance that tension by expanding licensing while also smoothing market plumbing in other areas, including steps aimed at improving liquidity at regulated virtual asset trading platforms. Regulators have not finalised the advisory and management proposals, and the current consultation process is designed to gather feedback before legislative work moves forward. The government has said it plans to refine proposals and take legislation to the city’s legislature in 2026. The post Hong Kong Securities Body Pushes Back On Tighter Crypto Licensing Rules appeared first on Cryptonews .

Get Crypto Newsletter
Read the Disclaimer : All content provided herein our website, hyperlinked sites, associated applications, forums, blogs, social media accounts and other platforms (“Site”) is for your general information only, procured from third party sources. We make no warranties of any kind in relation to our content, including but not limited to accuracy and updatedness. No part of the content that we provide constitutes financial advice, legal advice or any other form of advice meant for your specific reliance for any purpose. Any use or reliance on our content is solely at your own risk and discretion. You should conduct your own research, review, analyse and verify our content before relying on them. Trading is a highly risky activity that can lead to major losses, please therefore consult your financial advisor before making any decision. No content on our Site is meant to be a solicitation or offer.